Back to featured work

Case study 01 · Platform Engineering / Kubernetes / Cloud Infrastructure

Enterprise Kubernetes Platform

Production platform infrastructure that makes application delivery more secure, observable, and repeatable.

60%

Lower deployment lead time

01

Overview

An enterprise-grade Kubernetes deployment platform built to reduce delivery friction while improving the consistency of production releases.

02

Context

Application teams needed a reliable path from source changes to production workloads without repeatedly rebuilding the underlying platform concerns.

03

My Role

Designed and built the platform from cluster provisioning through production releases, including networking, release management, security boundaries, certificate automation, and observability.

04

Architecture / Approach

The diagram is a sanitized conceptual view of the delivery path. It intentionally excludes proprietary infrastructure, internal services, access patterns, and implementation details.

Sanitized conceptual architecture
  1. 01Developer
  2. 02CI/CD
  3. 03Kubernetes Platform
  4. 04Application Workloads
  5. 05Observability / Security
Enterprise Kubernetes Platform technical visualization
05

Decisions & Tradeoffs

  1. 01

    On-prem Kubernetes on Tanzu

    Instead of

    Managed Kubernetes (EKS/GKE)

    Why

    Regulated workloads with data residency requirements and heavy integration with existing on-prem systems. Managed control planes would have added network egress, latency to internal dependencies, and compliance surface without removing the operational work that actually mattered.

  2. 02

    Multi-tenant clusters with namespace isolation and RBAC

    Instead of

    A dedicated cluster per team

    Why

    Cluster-per-team gives the cleanest blast radius but multiplies upgrade, patching, and capacity overhead across every team. Hard namespace boundaries, network policy, and controlled egress got most of the isolation at a fraction of the operational cost.

  3. 03

    cert-manager backed by Venafi

    Instead of

    cert-manager with a public ACME issuer

    Why

    Certificates had to chain to the corporate CA for internal DNS names that a public issuer cannot validate, and certificate lifecycle needed to be auditable centrally. Venafi provided the governance; cert-manager provided the Kubernetes-native automation.

  4. 04

    Dynatrace as the observability layer

    Instead of

    A self-hosted Prometheus and Grafana stack

    Why

    Self-hosting offers more control but means owning storage, retention, and alerting reliability for the platform itself. Auto-instrumentation gave immediate coverage across both the new platform and the existing estate, which mattered more than tuning flexibility.

06

Outcome

60%

Lower deployment lead time

07

Technologies

  • Kubernetes
  • Tanzu
  • AWS
  • Helm
  • Docker
  • cert-manager
  • Venafi
  • Dynatrace
  • Datadog