Case study 01 · Platform Engineering / Kubernetes / Cloud Infrastructure
Enterprise Kubernetes Platform
Production platform infrastructure that makes application delivery more secure, observable, and repeatable.
60%
Lower deployment lead time
Overview
An enterprise-grade Kubernetes deployment platform built to reduce delivery friction while improving the consistency of production releases.
Context
Application teams needed a reliable path from source changes to production workloads without repeatedly rebuilding the underlying platform concerns.
My Role
Designed and built the platform from cluster provisioning through production releases, including networking, release management, security boundaries, certificate automation, and observability.
Architecture / Approach
The diagram is a sanitized conceptual view of the delivery path. It intentionally excludes proprietary infrastructure, internal services, access patterns, and implementation details.
- 01Developer
- 02CI/CD
- 03Kubernetes Platform
- 04Application Workloads
- 05Observability / Security

Decisions & Tradeoffs
- 01
On-prem Kubernetes on Tanzu
Instead ofManaged Kubernetes (EKS/GKE)
WhyRegulated workloads with data residency requirements and heavy integration with existing on-prem systems. Managed control planes would have added network egress, latency to internal dependencies, and compliance surface without removing the operational work that actually mattered.
- 02
Multi-tenant clusters with namespace isolation and RBAC
Instead ofA dedicated cluster per team
WhyCluster-per-team gives the cleanest blast radius but multiplies upgrade, patching, and capacity overhead across every team. Hard namespace boundaries, network policy, and controlled egress got most of the isolation at a fraction of the operational cost.
- 03
cert-manager backed by Venafi
Instead ofcert-manager with a public ACME issuer
WhyCertificates had to chain to the corporate CA for internal DNS names that a public issuer cannot validate, and certificate lifecycle needed to be auditable centrally. Venafi provided the governance; cert-manager provided the Kubernetes-native automation.
- 04
Dynatrace as the observability layer
Instead ofA self-hosted Prometheus and Grafana stack
WhySelf-hosting offers more control but means owning storage, retention, and alerting reliability for the platform itself. Auto-instrumentation gave immediate coverage across both the new platform and the existing estate, which mattered more than tuning flexibility.
Outcome
60%
Lower deployment lead time
Technologies
- Kubernetes
- Tanzu
- AWS
- Helm
- Docker
- cert-manager
- Venafi
- Dynatrace
- Datadog